Tools:
The fedora is back. The whip is back. John Williams, Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, Harrison Ford are all back. Hell, even Karen Allen is back. So what´s missing from the fourth "Indiana Jones" adventure? The fun, the old school feeling, the maniacal villain.
There is a fabled Crystal Skull, which, when returned to its proper resting place, will unlock the secrets of a golden city, bestowing untold power on the recipient. Of course, Dr. Henry Jones (Ford) falls into the search for it and the city after being targeted by the government. He was kidnapped and used to get inside a high security compound housing artifacts. The Russians, led by Irina Spalko (a wasted Cate Blanchett), are after a mummified corpse for an unspecified purpose. Jones is drug into the fray by a young whippersnapper (Shia LaBeouf), the son of his former flame Marion Ravenwood (Allen from the first film). With Spalko hot on their heels, the group sets out on one more adventure.
"Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" is a movie out of its time. Others have taken the same concept, notably the "National Treasure" films, and recreated the fun attitude of "Raiders of the Lost Ark." In a word, the film is flat relying on brief comedic moments pilfered from the rest of the series instead of creating new gags or memories. After an entire film of batting away references to his lineage, is their any reason for Jones to call Mutt (LaBeouf) "Junior" other than to invoke Sean Connery in "The Last Crusade?" Why, in the opening action sequence, does the script bother to drop references-and a brief glimpse-of the Ark of the Covenant? And why does Ford get the ubiquitous line,"I have a bad feeling about this"?
Nostalgia, pure and simple. Drop enough references to other, more popular work and the audience will be apt to overlook this installment´s shortcomings. Ironically, none of them have to do with the actors involved. All, though, come directly from the script. Let´s start with something I´ve already mentioned: Cate Blanchett. It seems to me if you´re going to have an Oscar winner in your film, you give her something to do. A meaty part, a mustache-twisting, diabolical identity unlike anything we´ve ever seen. But she and the Russians are merely set dressing, an obstacle for Indy and his intrepid group to overcome on their merry little way. They are almost an afterthought, a plot device to set the mood and time period for the events so the audience doesn´t forget them.
All the supposed mind control expert does is stalk around in a grey form-fitting jumpsuit, spouting set up lines to Ford (befitting a classic James Bond villain more than a Soviet agent) like,"Any last words, Dr. Jones?" He then responds "I like Ike," a sentiment most likely designed as another in a long line of one liners from the film. She never comes off as deadly as Bellog from the first film or even a credible threat.
"The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" feeds on our love for the characters and this type of adventure, so much so the script forgets to blaze a new, fresh path. It even forgets its own internal logic. What is the power of the city of gold? Is it power for world domination? Is it the knowledge of the universe? The film never really gets to that part in the end; instead, it´s hell bent on delivering a whiz-bang CGI experience where one isn´t called for. It´s as if the ending to "AI" was dropped into "The Searchers." Quite simply, the effects at the end don´t mesh with the practical effects that come before. Instead of staying grounded in reality, the climax takes a left turn when it should have gone right. The result? A jaw-dropping mindless coda Indy aficionados and general audiences will probably snicker at.
Ford, soon to be 66 years old, does his damnedest to bring Indy back in the exact same way we remember. By and large, he succeeds. All he has to do, really, is put on his trademark hat and wear a pair of brown pants and the character is born again. His age, mentioned ad nauseum in the press, isn´t much of a factor here. Other characters mention it, often in a joking manner, yet Jones himself doesn´t feel old. He may have lost a step and doesn´t crack his whip nearly enough, but he´s still Indy.
The rest of the cast fills out their roles as expected. Allen is back, a bit pudgier and older than we remember her, without missing a beat from the first film. John Hurt gets to mumble half his lines, a step up from his role in "Recount." Jim Broadbent, in a bid to replace characters not in this installment, gets precious little screen time, making the most of it. And Winstone…his George McHale-one of Indy´s long time friends-feels like a mere plot device instead of a flesh and blood person. As a character, we have no connection to Mac while he fits into a very specific category of second bananas upset at being the second banana. His eventual fate doesn´t shock or surprise or elicit any other emotion besides a shrug.
Which brings us to, I guess, LaBeouf. It is clear Lucas and Spielberg intend to bring Mutt back for another film, perhaps even in the lead role, based on the final scene. Coming off of both "Transformers" and "Disturbia" last year, LaBeouf presents a mature immaturity in his greaser role, with the right amount of smart aleck quips and reverence for his elders. But I´d maintain he´s not ready to take the mantle of the "Indiana Jones" franchise. He needs to grow up just a little bit more, gain a world weariness look to him similar to the one Ford had back in 1981. Right now, he´s too pretty and manicured. Given time, there is potential.
Maybe it´s a symptom of the iconic music being too prevalent in our society, but I found the score by John Williams to be too understated. As with his composition for "Superman Returns," I wanted-and expected-a grand new version of the Indy theme at least once with the motif running through the entire production. It is there, to be fair, though not in the way I was expecting. Imagine a "Jaws" film without the famous music telling us the shark is on the way. It always feels like something is missing.
After nearly two decades, "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" reunites a legendary character with his equally legendary creators. But to what effect? Just to have one last go ´round? A victory lap? To prove Ford could carry an action movie and Lucas isn´t as bad as the "Star Wars" prequels would have us believe? What is the point in this fourth installment, besides a quest for bigger box office? Even the story is half baked, relying on science fiction instead of fact…or some semblance there of.
Something is missing in the film. Maybe Indy doesn´t belong in this century. Maybe the combination of the classical whip and fedora with UFO´s and aliens just doesn´t fit. The spark just isn´t there. It´s always a pleasure to reconnect with an old friend. The time has come, though, to finally say goodbye. Let Indy ride into the sunset with Marion. The latest adventure for the famed archaeologist garners a 6 out of 10.
Sunday, May 25, 2008
Member since:
January 2005
January 2005
Let's face it, the movie was really awful. Sure the beginning was up to par for Indiana Jones, but once the bomb went off...well, let just say that was that. Lucas and Spielberg need to learn that CG monkey's are not the answer to a movie's problems..Its a great script and using terrific actors to their full potential. Time to get back back to basics and stop ruining their legacies.
Sunday, May 25, 2008
Member since:
April 2008
April 2008
DELETED BECAUSE OF SPOILERS.
[Post edited by tylerdurden on May 25, 2008]
[Post edited by tylerdurden on May 25, 2008]
Sunday, May 25, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
Sunday, May 25, 2008
Member since:
September 2007
September 2007
yeah this movie sucked! i was gonna buy the blu ray set when they came out but i think ill just keep my dvd set without the 4th film, wow!!!!!!! lucas, spelberg, and harrison ford, never thought that combo would ever make something this bad
Sunday, May 25, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
tylerdurden,
Does the word "spoilers" mean anything to you, or were you purposely trying to ruin the movie for people who haven't seen it?
John
Does the word "spoilers" mean anything to you, or were you purposely trying to ruin the movie for people who haven't seen it?
John
Monday, May 26, 2008
Member since:
December 2007
December 2007
It was a good movie, not like the original three, but decent enough. I would give it a B-. I wasn't really into the skull story, I have a hard time believing thats the best script they had.
Monday, May 26, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
Now, in fairness to the new "Indy," I liked it more than I expected I would and, apparently, a little more than Jason did.
No, it isn't the old "Indy," but who among us is the same person we used to be? The new film does its best to reference not just the older "Indy" films but as many cultural icons of the fifties as possible--thus, the inclusion of flying saucers and aliens, very big deals in the movies and in the general culture of the 1950s.
But, no, the new movie doesn't quite capture the magic of the first movies, despite the actors' best intentions. I blame a script that doesn't establish relationships well enough and goes for too much spectacle and chases, especially at the end. If "Raiders" is a 10/10, "Crusade" is a 9/10, and "Doom" is an 8/10, I'd give "Indy 4" a 7/10. Still, that's pretty close to the 6/10 Jason gave it, so maybe we're not so far apart after all.
John
[Post edited by John J. Puccio on May 26, 2008]
No, it isn't the old "Indy," but who among us is the same person we used to be? The new film does its best to reference not just the older "Indy" films but as many cultural icons of the fifties as possible--thus, the inclusion of flying saucers and aliens, very big deals in the movies and in the general culture of the 1950s.
But, no, the new movie doesn't quite capture the magic of the first movies, despite the actors' best intentions. I blame a script that doesn't establish relationships well enough and goes for too much spectacle and chases, especially at the end. If "Raiders" is a 10/10, "Crusade" is a 9/10, and "Doom" is an 8/10, I'd give "Indy 4" a 7/10. Still, that's pretty close to the 6/10 Jason gave it, so maybe we're not so far apart after all.
John
[Post edited by John J. Puccio on May 26, 2008]
Monday, May 26, 2008
Member since:
October 2004
October 2004
If Crusade is a "9/10" then Eddie is going to be named "People's" Sexiest Man next year.
Seriously, it's a really bad movie. It's the Phantom Menace of the franchise.
Temple of Doom gets short shrift though - darn good popcorn flick.
I was planning to see Crystal Skull this week but now I hear it has cute CGI animals in it. WTF?
Seriously, it's a really bad movie. It's the Phantom Menace of the franchise.
Temple of Doom gets short shrift though - darn good popcorn flick.
I was planning to see Crystal Skull this week but now I hear it has cute CGI animals in it. WTF?
Monday, May 26, 2008
Member since:
July 2006
July 2006
The fourth installment of the whip-cracking professor's exploits, "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull," grossed an estimated $101 million from Friday to Sunday, plus $25 million from its opening Thursday.
That would put it behind only "Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End," which had a Friday-through-Monday total of $139.8 million, in the pantheon of Memorial Day weekend blockbusters.
"This is the definition of a summer movie from two of the architects of the summer movie season — George Lucas and Steven Spielberg," he said. "These guys have it down to a science and audiences want to go along for that ride."
The first three Indy movies took in $1.2 billion worldwide.
Disney's action sequel, "The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian," slipped to second place with $23 million, for a total of $91.1 million over two weeks. The company expected the movie to continue to play well as school lets out.
Marvel Studios' "Iron Man" clinched another $20.1 million, bringing its domestic total to $252.3 million. A sequel is set for release in 2010.
Fox senior vice president Bert Livingstone said high gas prices were encouraging people to see movies rather than take long trips away from home.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080525/ap_en_mo/box_office_ylt=Ajx.Mfd63bnqB0vfE1_TJYpxFb8C
That would put it behind only "Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End," which had a Friday-through-Monday total of $139.8 million, in the pantheon of Memorial Day weekend blockbusters.
"This is the definition of a summer movie from two of the architects of the summer movie season — George Lucas and Steven Spielberg," he said. "These guys have it down to a science and audiences want to go along for that ride."
The first three Indy movies took in $1.2 billion worldwide.
Disney's action sequel, "The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian," slipped to second place with $23 million, for a total of $91.1 million over two weeks. The company expected the movie to continue to play well as school lets out.
Marvel Studios' "Iron Man" clinched another $20.1 million, bringing its domestic total to $252.3 million. A sequel is set for release in 2010.
Fox senior vice president Bert Livingstone said high gas prices were encouraging people to see movies rather than take long trips away from home.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080525/ap_en_mo/box_office_ylt=Ajx.Mfd63bnqB0vfE1_TJYpxFb8C
Monday, May 26, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
Deleted since Tyler was nice enough to remove his spoilers.
[Post edited by Tim Raynor on May 28, 2008]
[Post edited by Tim Raynor on May 28, 2008]
- Amazon: Sony Blu-ray player $228
- Amazon: Panasonic Profile 1.1 Blu-ray player under $300
- Firefly: The Complete Series on Blu-ray (Nov 11)
- Three Gangster titles headed to Blu-ray (Oct 14) (Updated Story)
- Theatrical Review of Vicky Cristina Barcelona
- CinemaNow downloads now playable on Macs
- This Week on DVD and Blu-ray - August 19, 2008
- Amazon: Save 55% on select Blu-ray titles
- 300 (Limited Collector’s Edition) on DVD
- The Polar Express in 3D on DVD & Blu-ray
- Casablanca (Ultimate Collector's Edition) on DVD & Blu-ray
- You Don't Mess with the Zohan on DVD & Blu-ray (Oct 7) (Updated Story)
- Animal House (30th Anniversary Edition) on DVD (Updated Story)
- Full details on Casino Royale Collector's Editon
- Forgetting Sarah Marshall on DVD & Blu-ray (Sept 30)
- Alvin and the Chipmunks (2007) on DVD
- Toshiba launch new DVD player with upconverting features
- Sony takes a new angle on PSP Movies